‘porn’

A Federal Court That Trusts People More Than Government

There’s a government agency in Washington whose job is deciding what’s “offensive” and should be kept off broadcast TV and radio—the FCC. Its policy is terribly, dangerously flexible. If material has to do with sexuality or excretory functions, it’s “offensive” if the commissioners decide it’s offensive. You don’t have the right to see or hear “offensive” material on broadcast TV. A federal court (including a judge appointed by President Bush) ruled this week that that’s just too vague, “creating a chilling effect that goes beyond the fleeting expletives at issue here.” That ruling is good news for parents, consumers, and…

Continue Reading
0 Comments

Congress Requiring Internet Filtering—Through the Back Door

Last week, the House agreed to a Senate amendment to a bill that funds the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. On the next-to-last page, it casually states: “None of the funds made available in this act may be used to maintain or establish a computer network unless such network blocks the viewing, downloading and exchanging of pornography.” Yes, buried in a bill (HR4899) that allocates $75,000,000,000 for the military, as well as for border security, veterans’ health, state education, and Haiti, Congress is preparing to require that all companies doing business with the federal government require internet filtering software. “Pornography”…

Continue Reading
0 Comments

Think Internet Censorship Can’t Happen Here?

A few years ago I helped sue the state of Ohio. I’m proud to say we just won an important victory—something that protects every American. Like many states in the early 2000s, Ohio passed a law criminalizing the sending of material “harmful to minors” on the internet. There were only 3 small problems with the law—“harmful to minors” wasn’t really defined, on the net you can’t know who’s a minor, and I have the First Amendment right to say what I want if it isn’t obscene or libelous. Other than that, the law was fine. As the publisher of Sexual…

Continue Reading
0 Comments

Court Finally Limits Persecution of Teen Sexuality

Sexting has come of age—it’s on the front page of today’s New York Times. The good news is that our judiciary has finally told prosecutors enough is enough. A U.S. Appeals Court just upheld a preliminary injunction barring local prosecutors from filing felony child-porn charges against a teenage girl who took a topless photo of herself with her cellphone. Eighteen months ago, sexy shots of three Pennsylvania teen girls—one showing her breasts, the others in bra or bathing suit—were taken and sent to some friends via cell phone. School officials busted them and 13 other students who had the pictures…

Continue Reading
0 Comments

Speaking As Janet Jackson’s Nipple…

…I gotta say I’m kinda confused. OK, I’m peeved. When I think of what you people put me through after the 2004 Superbowl, I shiver—and not in a good way. That ½-second shot of me during halftime? First, you accused me of ruining not just half-time, but the rest of the game. Then Morality In Media starts a campaign to punish CBS, which the FCC eventually did. For months, congressmembers competed to see who could denounce me the loudest. Eventually this led to the federal government increasing the fines for on-air “indecency” by 1,000%. People even trashed me during the…

Continue Reading
0 Comments

Supreme Court: Free Expression Crucial—Unless It’s About Sex

You’ve heard about the recent Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. Overturning the heart of the McCain-Feingold Act, the Court said that corporate donations to elections cannot be limited because it would violate the First Amendment. How bad is this? Said the New York Times, “The Supreme Court has handed lobbyists a new weapon. A lobbyist can now tell any elected official: if you vote wrong, my company, labor union or interest group will spend unlimited sums explicitly advertising against your re-election.” Former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor added she is concerned that “the problem…

Continue Reading
0 Comments